Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Elahi Galan vs Tigre Hank Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Galan vs Hank analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Elahi Galan vs Tigre Hank Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Galan 1 - 1 Hank
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Galan has won 47.49% of points on their second serve, while Hank has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Galan, in recent form, has won 49.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hank has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Galan has saved 61.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hank has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Galan has won 46.88% of matches played (W/L 30/ 34), with Hank winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Galan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 252/ 182), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 3/ 17). Hank has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 129/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Galan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Hank has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Galan winning 1 times and Hank being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Galan winning 2 and Hank winning 2. The last match between Galan and Hank was at the Mexico F8, 22-06-2015, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniel Elahi Galan getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Galan and Hank have played a deciding set 0 times, with Galan winning 0 times and Hank 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Galan winning 0, and Hank 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Galan has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.78 while Hank has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Galan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hank has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Galan has converted 36.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hank has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
106
Rank
56
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
416
High
32
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
55% (369-303)
Career Total W/L
48% (158-173)
44% (14-18)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,437,670
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Elahi Galan vs Tigre Hank For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Galan VS Hank
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Elahi Galan | Tigre Hank |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 7-6(8) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Elahi Galan | Tigre Hank |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (14/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (35/45) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (373/423) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 188 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.34 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1644/2720) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1100/1644) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (511/1076) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (79/218) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (967/2591) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 65% (11/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (20/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Elahi Galan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Radu Albot
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
73%
(
78 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
5
Aces
18
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
53 of
79)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
25 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
119)
126
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Gabriel Diallo
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Harold Mayot
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tigre Hank Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Carou
Player
Tigre Hank
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Tigre Hank
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Ribeiro
Player
Tigre Hank
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Tigre Hank
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tigre Hank
Player
Cayetano March
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tigre Hank
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tigre Hank
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
109)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Tigre Hank
89%
(
62 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tigre Hank
Player
Arklon Huertas Del Pino
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Galan Vs Hank Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Galan are available here and Hank photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
